independent execution authority

JR Hart Co is engaged when initiatives are visible, funded, and strategically endorsed — yet still not moving.

Not because the strategy is wrong.
Because no one is truly accountable for execution.

This is not advisory work.

There are no alignment workshops.
No transformation theater.
No slide decks explaining why the work is hard.

This is execution under authority.

Critical initiatives rarely fail due to bad ideas.

They fail because:

• Responsibility is distributed instead of owned.
• Decision rights blur across functions.
• Risk accumulates while meetings multiply.
• “Alignment” replaces consequence.
   

By the time this is obvious, capital has already been deployed and delay is already expensive.

Adding more governance, encouragement, or consultants increases drag.

JR Hart Co provides Independent Execution Authority.

That means:

• Decision rights are made explicit.
• Accountable owners are named publicly.
• Trade-offs are forced into daylight.
• Initiatives without economic defense are stopped.
• Timelines are compressed.
• Consequence returns to the system.
   

We operate with direct access to the hiring principal — typically the CEO, Board, or PE Operating Partner — and with explicit authority to drive decisions through to outcome.

If that authority is not granted, the engagement does not proceed.

Engagements are finite, focused, and consequence-driven.

They typically include:

• Rapid identification of structural execution failures.
• Clarification of decision ownership and escalation paths.
• Direct leadership of the initiative through its unstable phase.
• Restoration of durable operating cadence.
• Clean transition back to internal leadership once execution holds.
   

We do not build dependency.

We build systems that function without us.

Reach out if:

• A strategic initiative exists but no single person can defend its outcomes.
• Capital has been committed but results are not materializing.
• Cross-functional complexity has exceeded leadership bandwidth.
• Delay is now more expensive than intervention.
• The Board is asking for delivery and management cannot structurally provide it.
   

If the problem can be solved with another alignment meeting, you do not need us.

If the issue is that someone must decide, own, and enforce...and no one is doing it? We should talk.